Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: [Springframework-user] Hibernate 3 and Spring 1.1.4

[Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...>]

+1 for releasing 1.2RC1 in March.

Dmitriy.

Juergen Hoeller wrote:

>Everybody,
>
>I would prefer to introduce Hibernate 3 support alongside Hibernate 2.1
>support in the core too. However, I'd also like to avoid messing around with
>a separate add-on...
>
>I still believe that Spring 1.2 RC1 would be a nice match for a Hibernate 3
>RC. Stuff like that and JMX support are already worth raising the version
>number to 1.2. So what about redesigning the schedule a bit: 1.1.5 by end of
>February, 1.2 RC1 in mid March?
>
>JMX support is more or less finished, at least for the 1.2 scope - Rob,
>would you agree? Hibernate 3 support is straightforward: essentially, I
>intend to spend one afternoon for a fresh port of the current Hibernate 2.1
>support.
>
>JCA CCI support is almost finished too, thanks to ongoing work by Thierry
>Templier (who's be working on it for a couple of months). I've already
>reviewed it a while ago, and what I saw looked good.
>
>So if we take those as cornerstones for Spring 1.2, we should be able to go
>for 1.2 RC1 within two or three weeks after 1.1.5: essentially, just moving
>the JMX support over from the sandbox, doing the Hibernate 3 port, and
>dropping the JCA support in from JIRA - then release 1.2 RC1.
>
>Documentation for those new modules can come afterwards, for 1.2 RC1 or 1.2
>final. That's gonna be a bit of work too, but in good old 1.1 RC spirit this
>doesn't have to be finished for 1.2 RC1.
>
>Everything else would have to be deferred till Spring 1.3 then, for example
>portlet support (which is scheduled for 1.3 anyway), Cayenne support, etc.
>I'd estimate the target date for 1.3 to be around August.
>
>The keys to an early 1.2 release are manageable scope and focused work. I
>believe we can release 1.2 RC1 in mid March, and probably 1.2 final in late
>April, provided that we keep the scope limited (as suggested above).
>
>Thoughts? Opinions? Availabilities till mid March?
>
>Juergen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
>Colin Sampaleanu
>Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:54 PM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Springframework-user] Hiberante 3 and Spring 1.1.4
>
>
>If it's that close, I don't really see an issue with having 3.0 supprt
>as an addon for 1.1.5. It could for example be in the sandbox, and a
>part of the ant script could even package up that part separately. I
>guess the main reason not to have it built in for 1.1.5 is the fact that
>Hib 3 still won't be out by then, and our code will be new enough it
>won't be really well tested enough. But as for 1.2, I think it makes
>sense to have both versions. They don't interfere with each other, and
>people will be using both Hibernate 2.1 and 3 in the next year at least.
>At some point after that it would make sense to deprecate the 2.1
>support. This all assumes we even have the time resources to do it for
>1.1.5...
>
>tho...@tr... wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hibernate 3.0 beta 3 just came out and they state that a release candidate
>>    
>>
>is
>  
>
>>just weeks away.  Maybe we could provide a separate add-on module for 1.1.5
>>    
>>
>and
>  
>
>>then swap out Hibernate 2 for Hibernate 3 in 1.2 RC1 with a separate
>>    
>>
>Hibernate 2
>  
>
>>as an add-on.
>>
>>Thomas
>>
>>
>>Quoting Juergen Hoeller <ju...@in...>:
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hibernate3 support is planned for Spring 1.2, not to be released before
>>>      
>>>
>1.2
>  
>
>>>RC1 (early April).
>>>
>>>Hibernate3 unfortunately uses a different package name (org.hibernate
>>>instead of net.sf.hibernate), so we need to provide a separate but
>>>      
>>>
>analogous
>  
>
>>>set of support classes (in org.springframework.orm.hibernate3).
>>>
>>>In general, we don't include such major new features in point releases.
>>>Cayenne support, JCA support and JMX support are also planned for 1.2 RC1.
>>>Essentially, 1.2 will mainly be about those four new modules.
>>>
>>>Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: spr...@li...
>>>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
>>>Richard Hightower
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:06 PM
>>>To: spr...@li...
>>>Subject: [Springframework-user] Hiberante 3 and Spring 1.1.4
>>>
>>>
>>>This may be a dumb question.
>>>
>>>Does Spring 1.1.4 (the latest) have support for Hibernate 3?
>>>
>>>I think I read once that it is only in CVS, and I did not see a mention of
>>>it in the release notes for 1.1.4.
>>>
>>>
>>>I thought I would ask.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- r i c k    h i g h t o w e r
>>>-- CTO
>>>-- rhi...@ar...
>>>-- http://www.arc-mind.com
>>>-- p: 520-290-6855
>>>-- m: 520-661-6753
>>>-- f: 520-290-4179
>>>-- 15378 e colossal cave rd
>>>-- Tucson, AZ 85641
>>>
>>>Spring is good
>>>http://linuxworld.com/story/47735.htm
>>>
>>>JSF is good
>>>http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=46402&DE=1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-user mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-user
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>  
>