|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-02-02 22:42:40
|
Everybody, I would prefer to introduce Hibernate 3 support alongside Hibernate 2.1 support in the core too. However, I'd also like to avoid messing around with a separate add-on... I still believe that Spring 1.2 RC1 would be a nice match for a Hibernate 3 RC. Stuff like that and JMX support are already worth raising the version number to 1.2. So what about redesigning the schedule a bit: 1.1.5 by end of February, 1.2 RC1 in mid March? JMX support is more or less finished, at least for the 1.2 scope - Rob, would you agree? Hibernate 3 support is straightforward: essentially, I intend to spend one afternoon for a fresh port of the current Hibernate 2.1 support. JCA CCI support is almost finished too, thanks to ongoing work by Thierry Templier (who's be working on it for a couple of months). I've already reviewed it a while ago, and what I saw looked good. So if we take those as cornerstones for Spring 1.2, we should be able to go for 1.2 RC1 within two or three weeks after 1.1.5: essentially, just moving the JMX support over from the sandbox, doing the Hibernate 3 port, and dropping the JCA support in from JIRA - then release 1.2 RC1. Documentation for those new modules can come afterwards, for 1.2 RC1 or 1.2 final. That's gonna be a bit of work too, but in good old 1.1 RC spirit this doesn't have to be finished for 1.2 RC1. Everything else would have to be deferred till Spring 1.3 then, for example portlet support (which is scheduled for 1.3 anyway), Cayenne support, etc. I'd estimate the target date for 1.3 to be around August. The keys to an early 1.2 release are manageable scope and focused work. I believe we can release 1.2 RC1 in mid March, and probably 1.2 final in late April, provided that we keep the scope limited (as suggested above). Thoughts? Opinions? Availabilities till mid March? Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Colin Sampaleanu Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:54 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-user] Hiberante 3 and Spring 1.1.4 If it's that close, I don't really see an issue with having 3.0 supprt as an addon for 1.1.5. It could for example be in the sandbox, and a part of the ant script could even package up that part separately. I guess the main reason not to have it built in for 1.1.5 is the fact that Hib 3 still won't be out by then, and our code will be new enough it won't be really well tested enough. But as for 1.2, I think it makes sense to have both versions. They don't interfere with each other, and people will be using both Hibernate 2.1 and 3 in the next year at least. At some point after that it would make sense to deprecate the 2.1 support. This all assumes we even have the time resources to do it for 1.1.5... tho...@tr... wrote: >Hibernate 3.0 beta 3 just came out and they state that a release candidate is >just weeks away. Maybe we could provide a separate add-on module for 1.1.5 and >then swap out Hibernate 2 for Hibernate 3 in 1.2 RC1 with a separate Hibernate 2 >as an add-on. > >Thomas > > >Quoting Juergen Hoeller <ju...@in...>: > > > >>Hibernate3 support is planned for Spring 1.2, not to be released before 1.2 >>RC1 (early April). >> >>Hibernate3 unfortunately uses a different package name (org.hibernate >>instead of net.sf.hibernate), so we need to provide a separate but analogous >>set of support classes (in org.springframework.orm.hibernate3). >> >>In general, we don't include such major new features in point releases. >>Cayenne support, JCA support and JMX support are also planned for 1.2 RC1. >>Essentially, 1.2 will mainly be about those four new modules. >> >>Juergen >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: spr...@li... >>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of >>Richard Hightower >>Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:06 PM >>To: spr...@li... >>Subject: [Springframework-user] Hiberante 3 and Spring 1.1.4 >> >> >>This may be a dumb question. >> >>Does Spring 1.1.4 (the latest) have support for Hibernate 3? >> >>I think I read once that it is only in CVS, and I did not see a mention of >>it in the release notes for 1.1.4. >> >> >>I thought I would ask. >> >> >> >>-- r i c k h i g h t o w e r >>-- CTO >>-- rhi...@ar... >>-- http://www.arc-mind.com >>-- p: 520-290-6855 >>-- m: 520-661-6753 >>-- f: 520-290-4179 >>-- 15378 e colossal cave rd >>-- Tucson, AZ 85641 >> >>Spring is good >>http://linuxworld.com/story/47735.htm >> >>JSF is good >>http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=46402&DE=1 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Springframework-user mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-user |