Re: [Springframework-developer] jpetstore upgraded to iBatis 2.0

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

I added the DTD mainly because the DTDs are sometimes handy to have, 
especially when there is no internet connectivity or something needs to 
be looked up manually. If you object to it there we can just remove it.

Colin

Juergen Hoeller wrote:

>Colin,
>
>I've noticed that you added the iBATIS DTDs to our lib/ibatis directory in
>CVS. What do we need them for?
>
>I'll remove ibatis-common.jar and jdom.jar from CVS, BTW, as they are only
>needed to run SQL Maps 1.3. I'll only keep ibatis-sqlmap.jar, for building
>our SQL Maps 1.3 support.
>
>Juergen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
>Of Juergen Hoeller
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:25 PM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] jpetstore upgraded to iBatis
>2.0
>
>
>That's great, Colin! I'll give the revised JPetStore a try as soon as I can.
>I originally planned such an upgrade for 1.2 RC1, but it's a good fit for
>1.1.4 too. iBATIS 2.0 is certainly already mainstream. As of Spring 1.2, we
>should probably deprecate the iBATIS 1.x support classes, and remove them
>completely in Spring 1.3.
>
>On a related note, I recently implemented iBATIS 2.0 TypeHandlers that
>delegate to Spring's LOB support. I put them into our sandbox for the time
>being, as they were not able to work due to some restriction in the iBATIS
>TypeHandler support. Clinton addressed that issue in the just-released
>iBATIS 2.0.9, so I'll complete those LOB TypeHandlers and move them over to
>the main source tree for Spring 1.1.4.
>
>Juergen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
>Of Colin Sampaleanu
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 6:48 PM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: [Springframework-developer] jpetstore upgraded to iBatis 2.0
>
>
>I spent some time and upgraded jpetstore to use iBatis 2.0 instead of
>1.0 like it was using. It was incredibly tedious since almost every
>element in the mapping files had to be renamed, but on the other hand
>the conversion was very straightforward, with essentailly a one-to-one
>conversion from old to new, so I hope I didn't break anything. It seems
>to work ok, but if anybody else has 5 minutes to pull it out and play
>around with it a bit to try to catch any breakage, that would be good.
>
>We'll have to update the jpetstore under autobuilds too. I'm not clear
>if that's modified at all from the original. If not, the changed files
>can just be copied over.
>
>Colin
>  
>