|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2004-12-20 20:42:47
|
Eugene, I like the idea and I am more than willing to help. It would be great to provide a common framework for this kind of thing along with commons support for the AOP Alliance interfaces which will allow for the construction of really high performance AOP proxies. Rob Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > Folks, > > Sorry for the cross posting, but I'd like to make a formal proposal > for coordinated efford to generalize some of the common bytecode > transformations with ASM. > > It has been identified that Spring, AspectWerkz, CGLIB and DynAop > (indirectly trough CGLIB) projects have needs for "class proxy" > bytecode transformation. So, it seems makes sense to implement > something common and generic enoigh to be used across all projects. > > Thank you. > > Eugene > > > BRUNETON Eric RD-MAPS-GRE wrote: > > [skipped] > >> ... This could be an opportunity to start a new asm.adapters package >> containing commonly used adapters (the starting point could be a review >> of existing ASM adapters in CGLIB, AspectWerkz, ... to see if some >> abstract or even concrete transformers can be shared - after a >> generalization step, to make them customizable and reusable). This could >> be a common effort of the ASM community. >> >> Eric > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |