|
From: <jas...@ma...> - 2004-12-18 12:13:14
|
On 17 Dec 2004, at 17:19, Rod Johnson wrote: >> Thats great to know! I've been using lots of Tapestry + Spring + >> Hibernate lately and was a little worried that Tapestry 3.1 with all >> the HiveMind stuff might be painful to use what with all the HIveMind >> stuff everywhere - but this is great news! > Must say that I'm still not entirely comfortable with this direction > of Tapestry. It smacks of a certain software company's policy of > bundling things :-) :) Agreed - I'd have much rather Tapestry be built on pure dependency injection and leave the container up to the developer to choose... I'm still not sure why we need HiveMind when we have Spring :) James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ |