|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-12-17 14:46:26
|
I guess anothr option is using the new AspectWerkz proxy implementation... Rod Johnson wrote: > 1. Performance (marketing more than reality, but marketing can't be > ignored) > 2. Problems with the CGLIB implementation. Another approach may well > deliver better results. > 3. Potential to add additional features, if the approach works out well. > > It should be largely transparent to the developer view. I introduced > the AopProxyFactory interface for that reason. > > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >> Rob/Rod, >> >> can you please summarize the reasons to create another proxy >> implementation strategy? >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitriy. >> >> Rob Harrop wrote: >> >>> I agree, I'll put together a quick prototype either today or next >>> week to see how a specificically created proxy will perform. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> Rod Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> I would favour the Java code-based approach, using Velocity. I >>>> think that should deliver extremely good performance, and would >>>> rather we don't commit to maintaining a byte code approach. >>>> >>>> I don't believe there is any problem using code generation with our >>>> API. Indeed, I always meant to implement it, but performance >>>> optimization of the AOP framework has never been of any >>>> significance in practice. Only for marketing, as has been apparent >>>> recently :-) >>>> >>>> A Java based approach should definitely allow significant >>>> optimization, and would hopefully be simpler than the CGLIB >>>> approach and more maintainable. So there would be a real advantage, >>>> besides performance. There should be a particular optimization for >>>> methods with only before or after advice, skipping the present use >>>> of an interceptor to wrap them. The >>>> >>>> I would recommend hand-authoring a Java class, and benchmarking, to >>>> see exactly what the gains are, before putting a lot of effort into >>>> the approach. (But I'm sure they'll be large.) But I think this is >>>> definitely good stuff! >>>> >>>> Rgds >>>> Rod >>>> >>>> Rob Harrop wrote: >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> I am planning to add to an additional proxy implementation to >>>>> Spring to solve some of the problems we are experiencing with >>>>> other approaches and to allow for additional optimizations and >>>>> advice types to be added in the most efficient way. >>>>> >>>>> Currently, I'm looking at two separate approaches - Java-based >>>>> using Janino and Bytecode-based using SERP. The Java-based >>>>> approach should be quite simple to create and could be coupled >>>>> with Velocity to externalize much of the boilerplate code needed >>>>> for the creation of proxy classes. Alternatively we could add a >>>>> simple abstraction layer on top of Janino, a la .NET CodeDOM (good >>>>> idea James). The bytecode approach is much more complex and will >>>>> be harder to debug but it would probably allow for absolute raw >>>>> performance. >>>>> >>>>> I am comfortable with either approach although I think that Janino >>>>> would be ideal for our purposes. >>>>> >>>>> Your thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>>> users. >>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>>>> now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>> users. >>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>> now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>> Spr...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> > |