|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2004-11-18 00:24:16
|
After complaining to SF about the lack of JDK's in their compile farm, I=20 found six of them. Unfortunately for me, I'd checked the only 4 machines=20 that *didn't* have one before writing to them. Me and my mouth. Anyway, I now intend to attempt scheduled builds on five of the six machine= s=20 (2 are identical in terms of OS and JDK) and of course run the test suite. = =20 Once I have this working well, I'll attempt to run the autobuilds apps on=20 each supported servlet container (again on all five machines). The=20 advantage of the compile farm is in the range of platforms available. I'd like to get each machine to send an email to the dev list, but only on = a=20 build failure unless anyone sees value in an additional five daily emails=20 showing successful builds. Another option to investigate is FTP'ing the=20 report summaries somewhere - like the project web server to which we could= =20 presumably link from springframework.org...? Note though, that the CVS access on the CF machines is via the anonymous=20 pserver which can be up to 5 hours behind the SSH servers that we commit=20 changes to. Here's some detail on the machines that I'll be running this on: machine JDK OS =2D--------------------------------------------------------------------- x86-solaris1 Sun 1.4.1_06 Solaris 9 amd64-linux1 Sun 1.3.1 SUSE 8 (linux 2.4)=20 ppc-osx1 Sun 1.3.1 Mac OSX 10.1 ppc-osx2 Sun 1.4.1_01 Mac OSX 10.2 sparc-solaris1 Sun 1.4.0_03 Solaris 9 I note that there are a couple of outstanding requests at SF to add a JDK=20 1.5 to one of the machines too, so when that becomes available I'll use it= =20 too. Hopefully this will give us some additional confidence in the build=20 process, test suite and JDK/container compatibility. Regards, =2D-=20 Darren Davison Public Key: #DD356B0D |