Re: [activemq-dev] Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: [activemq-dev] Re: message driven POJOs, a lightweight JCA container available

[<jas...@ma...>]

On 28 Oct 2004, at 17:54, Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
> Jason Carreira wrote:
>
>>>   Are you suggesting to replace Spring with XWork? :-)
>
>> No, not at all... The project I was discussing uses Spring to wire 
>> everything together. I was just suggesting that you can have Action 
>> classes (really command objects) which don't have to know anything 
>> about JMS, and could even be reused across JMS, Web, or even command 
>> line. I like my components to be decoupled from the deployment 
>> technologies.
>
>   Still can't see why XWork action wold be better then POJO's managed 
> by Spring. In my case MDB is basically delegating all processing to 
> given POJO's.
>
>   I was thinking on doing somehow opposite thing. Use custom 
> interceptor, which will transparently serializes all parameters and 
> send them together with POJO name to JMS queue, which has pool of 
> consumers (MDB's in my case) that are asynchronously executing that 
> call on given POJO instance. :-)

Unless I'm missing something, that sounds exactly like Spring JMS 
Remoting :). The only difference is to use pooling, we'd probably use 
'message driven pojos'.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/