Re: [Springframework-developer] JMS remoting provider available

[<jas...@ma...>]

On 27 Oct 2004, at 19:40, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
> OK - thanks for the prompt response, James. I fully understand the=20
> effect of the JCAContainer; it's just that this is big enough to=20
> warrant Spring 1.2 :-) I'd prefer to publically introduce all those=20
> JMS-related new features in Spring 1.2 RC1, rather than in a 1.1.x=20
> point release. 1.2 RC1 is scheduled for early January, so isn't too=20
> far away...

Sounds great with me. We can have it all nicely documented by January=20
with a few more examples.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/