|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-10-21 09:28:08
|
I've just noticed that we're slightly inconsistent in our naming for = getters that return boolean bean properties. Most of them are called = "isXxx", but 9 of them in the entire codebase are called "getXxx". We should find a consistent rule here. For example, should we prefer = "isProxyTargetClass" or "getProxyTargetClass"? Neither is nice English, = so I guess it's more about a convention then about nice method names. I tend to prefer the "isXxx" versions for all boolean properties. That = would also be easier in terms of affected classes, as we just have 9 = accessors that do not conform to that rule (i.e. 9 to be deprecated). On the other hand, "getXxx" might result in slightly nicer English in = some boolean cases... Opinions? Juergen |