|
From: Seth L. <set...@gm...> - 2004-10-02 23:34:57
|
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:45:49 +0100, Rob Harrop <ro...@ca...> wrote: > Seth, > > I'll look into that setObjectName lark - seems strange to me. As for > the HmlAdaptorHost, I think it will be really useful to have a > collection of these and hopefully vendors will supply their own. I will > probably just supply one for the RI and a reflection based one that > works for a range of adaptors. Yeah, I saw from the package structure that it's easy to add multiple adapters. As far as Sun's Reference HTML Adapter... we'll need to add support for DisposableBean and for setting the MBeanServer before the call to start(). I spent yesterday hacking log4j to work with JMX 1.2 code. I was able to control log4j via JMX and the HTMLAdapter inside a Spring app. Very cool! Log4j, unfortunately, doesn't look too active these days, and I'm not sure how receptive they'll be of my updates. Which begs the question: would it be helpful for Spring to include updated JMX 1.2 support for Log4j? This would be a really big help I can imagine. We've already found it very useful to be able to manage our logging during runtime. Seth |