|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mca...@gm...> - 2004-09-21 05:00:46
|
Woo - this would be really cool. It would enable us to get rid of another config file from Confluence, replacing it with yet another Spring context file :) Cheers, Mike ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:27:54 -0500, Dmitriy Kopylenko <dko...@ru...> wrote: > I've added "org.springframework.cache.ehcache.EhCacheManagerFactoryBean" > and "org.springframework.cache.ehcache.EhCacheFactoryBean" to the > sandbox. Please take a look at it with any suggestions and/or comments. > Now, if we would provide such caching support classes, where would they > live. Is "org.springframework.cache" top level package appropriate with > sub packages for different caching subsystems i.e "ehcache", "oscache", > etc.? If we all agree on the package for caching support classes, > EHCache factory beans might make 1.1.1 > > Regards, > Dmitriy. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |