Re: [Springframework-developer] Status of 303 instead of 302 in RedirectView

[<jue...@we...>]

Now wouldn't it be nice if HttpServletResponse.sendRedirect already =
performed such a check and sent the appropriate status code...

Juergen


-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
Of Seth Ladd
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:32 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Status of 303 instead of 302 in
RedirectView


On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:30:53 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
<jue...@we...> wrote:
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-299
>=20
> I'm not intimately familar with the HTTP spec, so I can't really judge =
this.
>=20
> A possible compromise could be to just send 303 in case of a POST =
request, and keep sending 302 via response.sendRedirect else. Thoughts? =
Experiences?

It also sounds like we should send 302 always for HTTP 1.0 clients.=20
If the client is HTTP 1.1 aware, then 302 for GET and 303 for POST
sounds like what the RFC wants us to do.

Seth


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id=10808&op=3Dick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer