|
From: <tho...@tr...> - 2004-09-02 15:31:38
|
Yes, but just because it works in one instance does not make it a good practice :) I only used it because Eugene's test case was set up that way. From EJB 2.1 spec - 17.3.4 Enterprise Beans Using Container-Managed Transaction Demarcation: "The enterprise beans business methods, message listener methods, or ejbTimeout method must not attempt to obtain or use the javax.transaction.UserTransaction interface." So I think it would be wise not to mix strategies - either use J2EE BMT/Spring declarative transactions or J2EE CMT. That way we can stay withing the J2EE spec. If I have time this weekend I'll try to test these scenario with BMT on WLS 8.1 and 7.0. Thomas Quoting Colin Sampaleanu <col...@ex...>: > > eu wrote: > > > So, now it is unclear if it does work on WLS 8 in CMT scenario? > > It does, as per Thomas's confirmation... > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |