|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-27 16:03:05
|
Absolutely, they are Apache 2.0 licensed. The only real restriction is that somewhere in your distribution you should give attribution, as per the license. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Martin Kersten wrote: >Hi there, > > I rewrote my RPC implementation for using Spring's >remote-invocation classes. Since the classes are required >for the non-spring related part to function, I would have >to distribute three classes of Spring's codebase. >(for example to use the client-api). > >So the question rose, can I extract those classes and >provide them within my codebase by stating out, where >I got it from, and why are they needed. > >Any comments on that? > > >Cheers, > >Martin (Kersten) > > |