Re: [Springframework-developer] JMS ObjectMessage support

[<jas...@ma...>]

On 25 Aug 2004, at 20:59, Mark Pollack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really think it is bad practice, as I've said before, so I wouldn't 
> like
> to encourage it.

It works fine for java to java - so long as you've identical classpaths 
& jar versions, or well written hand-crafted Externalizable code. i.e. 
fragile :)

> However, I guess people should have enough rope to hang
> themselves.  Unless anyone else strongly objects, lets add it and put 
> my
> ominous opinion in the docs...

Agreed - it should be there for completeness if nothing else.

Plus someone could write a JMS facade or groovy JMS provider which uses 
other kinds of serialization on the wire, like XStream or XMLBeans etc.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/