RE: [Springframework-developer] JMS ObjectMessage support

[Mark P. <mar...@co...>]

Hi,

I really think it is bad practice, as I've said before, so I wouldn't =
like
to encourage it.  However, I guess people should have enough rope to =
hang
themselves.  Unless anyone else strongly objects, lets add it and put my
ominous opinion in the docs...

- Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...=20
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:46 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: [Springframework-developer] JMS ObjectMessage support
>=20
>=20
> Mark, everybody,
>=20
> We have a request for ObjectMessage support in SimpleMessageConverter:
>=20
> http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?p=3D1470
>=20
> I wouldn't mind readding that support, as my initial version=20
> had it too. Would you object to that? I take a relaxed=20
> position here: Noone's forced to pass Serializables in - but=20
> if someone wants to, why shouldn't we allow that? Of course,=20
> people need to be aware that they tie themselves to=20
> Java-to-Java messaging then: We can point that our clearly in=20
> the docs.
>=20
> Juergen
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on=20
> Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic=20
> DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free=20
> Shipping and Free Gift.=20
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20