|
From: jbetancourt <jbe...@co...> - 2004-08-21 11:12:17
|
Just had a thought while reading the 'explicity abstract' message. =20 Would it make sense to have the ability to make bean definitions = 'private', that is local only to other beans in the same context, and = the default is 'public'? I can't think of a use-case for this or if = it is already possible in current Spring core. <bean ...... access=3D"public" /> or=20 <bean ....... public=3D"false" /> Just a thought. |