Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2004-08-16 12:45:51
|
I have removed all @version tags. Thomas jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >Thomas, > >Any chance to do this today or tomorrow? > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von jürgen höller [werk3AT] >Gesendet: Do 12.08.2004 10:36 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags > > > >Thomas, > >Do you have the chance to remove all lines with $Id/$Revision tags today or tomorrow? I'd like to get this done this week, to be prepared for 1.1 final. > >Thanks in advance! > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von tho...@tr... >Gesendet: Mi 04.08.2004 17:08 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags > > > >I used JEdit which has excellent support for this kind of modifications. You >can easily replace using a regex in all java files in a certain directory tree. > Eclipse has similar support - but JEdit's search/replace seems easier to use. > >Thomas > > >Quoting Colin Sampaleanu <col...@ex...>: > > > >>I think Thomas finally changed the package names last year. >> >>I can do this with a regex search and replace. >> >>It's too bad that SF is still running the older CVS 1.11.x series, and >>not the newer 1.12.x series. The latter apparently respects using -kk to >>ignore the keywords on merges, while still working properly with binary >>files. That would probably be enough for me to change my vote the other way. >> >>Will try to do this at an opportune time... >> >>Colin >> >>Alef Arendsen wrote: >> >> >> >>>I think our Linux experts will have to jump in here ;-). I can recall Thomas >>> >>> >>or Colin changing all the package names from com.interface21 to >>org.springframework about a year ago... >> >> >>>Alef >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: spr...@li... >>>>[mailto:spr...@li...] >>>>On Behalf Of jürgen höller [werk3AT] >>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:31 AM >>>>To: spr...@li... >>>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>> >>>>OK, so how do we go about removing the @version tags then - >>>>in an automated fashion? >>>> >>>>Juergen >>>> >>>> >>>>________________________________ >>>> >>>>Von: spr...@li... im >>>>Auftrag von Alef Arendsen >>>>Gesendet: Di 03.08.2004 10:18 >>>>An: spr...@li... >>>>Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Sorry, forgot about this. >>>> >>>>I'll add my +1 to removing them. >>>> >>>>Just use @author and @since. >>>> >>>>So the vote is: >>>> >>>>3 for >>>>5 against >>>>1 neutral >>>> >>>>Alef >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>From: spr...@li... >>>>>[mailto:spr...@li...] >>>>>On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko >>>>>Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:15 PM >>>>>To: spr...@li... >>>>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>> >>>>>So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then? >>>>> >>>>>Dmitriy. >>>>> >>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>3 in favor >>>>>>4 against >>>>>>2 neutral >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>I've always >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>also been >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>the case in every open source project I have been involved in or >>>>>>>used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>continue to do >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>it... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>build process >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>actually got >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>our Views so >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>however, I also understand the problem with >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>branch/merge...but why >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>doesn't the -kk solution work? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>+0 for $Id$ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>later. >>>>>>>Bill >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Let's give others a chance ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Rob Harrop wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Shootout at noon? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Rob >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>From: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko >>>>>>>>>Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >>>>>>>>>To: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>@version tags >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >>>>>>>>>3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >>>>>>>>>1 neutral (Darren) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to >>>>>>>>>>blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to >>>>>>>>>>branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>and Eclipse, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>wherever I am. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>of them)... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>>>>>>>>>personally don't think that they add much value. Of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>course, if a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>concede ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the >>>>>>>>>>>>creation date. That has been quite nice during our >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>agile way >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>version numbers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>there now. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all >>>>>>>>>>>>source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is >>>>>>>>>>>>probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>alignment >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>easy again. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Juergen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Von: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>spr...@li... im >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>>>>>>>>>Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>>>>>>>>>An: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>@version >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>tags >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>through my >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>standardized, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I won't know if I've worked on a particular file >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>any more :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>or create >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>new ones >>>>>>>>>>>>>;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when >>>>>>>>>>>>trying to merge files back in after a branch, causing a >>>>>>>>>>>>conflict/change to exist when there shouldn't be >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>any... There >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>seems to be a trend to going away from using them in >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>files, by >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>some people, for this reason. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Colin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>the changes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>few weeks? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>Open Source >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. >>>>>>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>Spr...@li... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>r >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>the changes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>few weeks? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>Open Source >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. >>>>>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ >>>>>>Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>Spr...@li... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>the changes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>few weeks? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source >>>>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. >>>>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ >>>>>Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>Spr...@li... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on >>Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, >>one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology >>Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com >>_______________________________________________ >>Springframework-developer mailing list >>Spr...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> >> > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on >Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, >one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology >Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media >100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 >Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. >http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media >100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 >Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. >http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > |
