RE: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final

[Rod J. <ro...@in...>]

Thanks! Yes, we should definitely stress the more concise form. I'll =
look at
the reference manual material as soon as I can and give my views on
emphasis.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Colin Sampaleanu
Sent: 16 August 2004 06:25
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final

I've documented this, and also added text in the manual in the AOP and
transaction sections talking about the more concise form for defining
multiple proxies which can share some properties, by using parent/child =
bean
definitions, along with an inner bean for the proxy target.

I'm actually of the opinion that we should change our samples to use =
this
form, for the TransactionProxyFactoryBean cases. I can't think of a =
reason
why somebody would ever not use the parent/child form when defining more
than a couple of transaction proxies. I realize our samples don't have =
many
proxies, but people are going to copy those as best-form, boilerplate =
code,
and wind up with much more verbose definitions than they really need to
have.

Regards,
Colin

Colin Sampaleanu wrote:

> I'll document this some time today, and look for any other low-hanging =

> fruit...
>
> Rod Johnson wrote:
>
>> Great!
>>
>> I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that supports=20
>> the use of instance (rather than static) factory methods in the=20
>> Reference Manual yet. (It is documented in the DTD.) Doesn't justify=20
>> holding the release, but worth noting. (Hint, hint.)
>>
>> Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the release.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: spr...@li...
>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On=20
>> Behalf Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
>> Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04
>> To: spr...@li...
>> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>>
>> Everybody,
>>
>>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the=20
>>> only
>>
>> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the=20
>> HTTP invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll=20
>> try to add docs on it till Monday.
>>
>> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do=20
>> some final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP:=20
>> I currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there=20
>> are no showstoppers.
>>
>> Juergen
>




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media =
100pk
Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off
Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer