|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-13 19:26:31
|
Never mind, I got confused and thought this wasn't checked in, since the package name has changed since Dion's original post about this code. Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I thought I replied to this, but looks like I didn't. I'm in favour of > this being checked in, including groovy.jar. > > Colin > > > Rod Johnson wrote: > >> I've just written something that I think is rather cool that allows a >> bean >> to be written in Groovy yet configured via the full power of Spring >> Dependency Injection. It also supports reloading if the script changes, >> preserving existing references. >> >> I would like to check this into the sandbox. However, that would mean >> adding >> the groovy jar. Personally I'm in favour of adding Groovy anyway, as >> I think >> it would be good to be able to use it for tests, even before 1.1 final. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> R >> > |