|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-13 18:12:37
|
I thought I replied to this, but looks like I didn't. I'm in favour of this being checked in, including groovy.jar. Colin Rod Johnson wrote: >I've just written something that I think is rather cool that allows a bean >to be written in Groovy yet configured via the full power of Spring >Dependency Injection. It also supports reloading if the script changes, >preserving existing references. > >I would like to check this into the sandbox. However, that would mean adding >the groovy jar. Personally I'm in favour of adding Groovy anyway, as I think >it would be good to be able to use it for tests, even before 1.1 final. > >Thoughts? > >R > > |