Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

I used JEdit which has excellent support for this kind of modifications.  You
can easily replace using a regex in all java files in a certain directory tree.
 Eclipse has similar support - but JEdit's search/replace seems easier to use.

Thomas

Quoting Colin Sampaleanu <col...@ex...>:

> I think Thomas finally changed the package names last year.
>
> I can do this with a regex search and replace.
>
> It's too bad that SF is still running the older CVS 1.11.x series, and
> not the newer 1.12.x series. The latter apparently respects using -kk to
> ignore the keywords on merges, while still working properly with binary
> files. That would probably be enough for me to change my vote the other way.
>
> Will try to do this at an opportune time...
>
> Colin
>
> Alef Arendsen wrote:
>
> >I think our Linux experts will have to jump in here ;-). I can recall Thomas
> or Colin changing all the package names from com.interface21 to
> org.springframework about a year ago...
> >
> >Alef
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: spr...@li...
> >>[mailto:spr...@li...]
> >> On Behalf Of jürgen höller [werk3AT]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:31 AM
> >>To: spr...@li...
> >>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >>
> >>OK, so how do we go about removing the @version tags then -
> >>in an automated fashion?
> >>
> >>Juergen
> >>
> >>
> >>________________________________
> >>
> >>Von: spr...@li... im
> >>Auftrag von Alef Arendsen
> >>Gesendet: Di 03.08.2004 10:18
> >>An: spr...@li...
> >>Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Sorry, forgot about this.
> >>
> >>I'll add my +1 to removing them.
> >>
> >>Just use @author and @since.
> >>
> >>So the vote is:
> >>
> >>3 for
> >>5 against
> >>1 neutral
> >>
> >>Alef
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: spr...@li...
> >>>[mailto:spr...@li...]
> >>> On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> >>>Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:15 PM
> >>>To: spr...@li...
> >>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >>>
> >>>So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then?
> >>>
> >>>Dmitriy.
> >>>
> >>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>3 in favor
> >>>>4 against
> >>>>2 neutral
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>I've always
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS.  This has
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>also been
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>the case in every open source project I have been involved in or
> >>>>>used.  That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>continue to do
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>it...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>build process
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>actually got
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>deployed.  for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>our Views so
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>that we can view source in the running app to check the versions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>however, I also understand the problem with
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>branch/merge...but why
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>doesn't the -kk solution work?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>+0 for $Id$
> >>>>>
> >>>>>later.
> >>>>>Bill
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Let's give others a chance ;-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Rob Harrop wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Shootout at noon?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Rob
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>From: spr...@li...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> >>>>>>>Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16
> >>>>>>>To: spr...@li...
> >>>>>>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>@version tags
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob)
> >>>>>>>3 against  (Juergen, Thomas, Colin)
> >>>>>>>1 neutral (Darren)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to
> >>>>>>>>blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to
> >>>>>>>>branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>and Eclipse,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>wherever I am.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>of them)...
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I
> >>>>>>>>>>personally don't think that they add much value. Of
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>course, if a
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>concede ;-)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the
> >>>>>>>>>>creation date. That has been quite nice during our
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>agile way
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>version numbers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>there now.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all
> >>>>>>>>>>source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is
> >>>>>>>>>>probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>alignment
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>easy again.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Juergen
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Von:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>spr...@li... im
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu
> >>>>>>>>>>Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38
> >>>>>>>>>>An: spr...@li...
> >>>>>>>>>>Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>@version
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>tags
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>through my
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>standardized,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>I won't know if I've worked on a particular file
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>any more :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>or create
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>new ones
> >>>>>>>>>>>;-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when
> >>>>>>>>>>trying to merge files back in after a branch, causing a
> >>>>>>>>>>conflict/change to exist when there shouldn't be
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>any... There
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>seems to be a trend to going away from using them in
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>files, by
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>some people, for this reason.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Colin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>the changes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>few weeks?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>Open Source
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> >>>>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> >>>>>Springframework-developer mailing list
> >>>>>Spr...@li...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>r
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>the changes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>few weeks?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG-
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>Open Source
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> >>>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> >>>>Springframework-developer mailing list
> >>>>Spr...@li...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> >>>
> >>>
> >>the changes
> >>
> >>
> >>>on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> >>>
> >>>
> >>few weeks?
> >>
> >>
> >>>Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source
> >>>Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> >>>www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> >>>Springframework-developer mailing list
> >>>Spr...@li...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
> Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
> one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
> Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>