RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

I think our Linux experts will have to jump in here ;-). I can recall =
Thomas or Colin changing all the package names from com.interface21 to =
org.springframework about a year ago...

Alef

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...=20
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:31 AM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
>=20
> OK, so how do we go about removing the @version tags then -=20
> in an automated fashion?
> =20
> Juergen
> =20
>=20
> ________________________________
>=20
> Von: spr...@li... im=20
> Auftrag von Alef Arendsen
> Gesendet: Di 03.08.2004 10:18
> An: spr...@li...
> Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Sorry, forgot about this.
>=20
> I'll add my +1 to removing them.
>=20
> Just use @author and @since.
>=20
> So the vote is:
>=20
> 3 for
> 5 against
> 1 neutral
>=20
> Alef
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spr...@li...
> > [mailto:spr...@li...]
> >  On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:15 PM
> > To: spr...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >
> > So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then?
> >
> > Dmitriy.
> >
> > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >
> > > 3 in favor
> > > 4 against
> > > 2 neutral
> > >
> > >
> > > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally
> > I've always
> > >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS.  This has
> > also been
> > >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or=20
> > >> used.  That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to
> > continue to do
> > >> it...
> > >>
> > >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the
> > build process
> > >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed=20
> actually got=20
> > >> deployed.  for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for
> > our Views so
> > >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions.
> > >>
> > >> however, I also understand the problem with=20
> branch/merge...but why=20
> > >> doesn't the -kk solution work?
> > >>
> > >> +0 for $Id$
> > >>
> > >> later.
> > >> Bill
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Let's give others a chance ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Rob Harrop wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Shootout at noon?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Rob
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: spr...@li...
> > >>>>
> > [mailto:spr...@li...] On
> > >>>> Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> > >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16
> > >>>> To: spr...@li...
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and=20
> @version tags
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob)
> > >>>> 3 against  (Juergen, Thomas, Colin)
> > >>>> 1 neutral (Darren)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>=20
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to=20
> > >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to=20
> > >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise
> > and Eclipse,
> > >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways,
> > wherever I am.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid=20
> of them)...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Dmitriy.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> =20
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I=20
> > >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of
> > course, if a
> > >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll=20
> > >>>>>>> concede ;-)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the=20
> > >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our=20
> agile way=20
> > >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use
> > version numbers
> > >>>>>>> there now.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all=20
> > >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is=20
> > >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter=20
> alignment=20
> > >>>>>>> easy again.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Juergen
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Von:=20
> spr...@li... im=20
> > >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu
> > >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38
> > >>>>>>> An: spr...@li...
> > >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and=20
> @version=20
> > >>>>>>> tags
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   =20
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code=20
> through my=20
> > >>>>>>>>> classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's
> > standardized,
> > >>>>>>>>> I won't know if I've worked on a particular file
> > any more :-)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>            =20
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes
> > or create
> > >>>>>>>> new ones
> > >>>>>>>> ;-)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Dmitriy.
> > >>>>>>>>=20
> > >>>>>>>>       =20
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when=20
> > >>>>>>> trying to merge files back in after a branch, causing a=20
> > >>>>>>> conflict/change to exist when there shouldn't be=20
> any... There=20
> > >>>>>>> seems to be a trend to going away from using them in
> > files, by
> > >>>>>>> some people, for this reason.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Colin
> > >>>>>>>     =20
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   =20
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------
> > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> > the changes
> > >> on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> > few weeks?
> > >> Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG-=20
> Open Source=20
> > >> Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> > >> www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> > >> Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> > >> Spr...@li...
> > >>
> >=20
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope
> > >> r
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> > the changes
> > > on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> > few weeks?
> > > Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG-=20
> Open Source=20
> > > Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> > > www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> > > Spr...@li...
> > >
> >=20
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed=20
> the changes=20
> > on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past=20
> few weeks?=20
> > Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source=20
> > Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.=20
> > www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> > Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> > Spr...@li...
> >=20
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the=20
> changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the=20
> past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are=20
> now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes=20
> on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com=20
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the=20
> changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the=20
> past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are=20
> now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes=20
> on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com=20
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20