RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

[Mark P. <mar...@co...>]

Hi,

I don't vote often, but -1 for using $Id$ in @version.  I don't think end
users really care to see the CVS id in the javadocs, it just adds noise.
Maybe a non javadoc style comment in the code with $Id$ is a reasonable
compromise?  I'd like to see @since be the release # of spring since it is
more meaningful to users.  

- Mark







> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li... 
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:35 AM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> 
> 
> So far it's 3 in favor, 2 against
> 
> 
> Rob Harrop wrote:
> 
> >+1 here as well - I find that the $Id$ tag is quite useful.
> > 
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: spr...@li...
> >[mailto:spr...@li...] On 
> >Behalf Of Rod Johnson
> >Sent: 29 July 2004 13:09
> >To: spr...@li...
> >Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >
> >+1 for $Id.
> >
> >I like to be able to see who last edited the file without looking at 
> >resource history (for example, offline). It also helps to 
> see whether a 
> >CVS commit has succeeded.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Dmitriy Kopylenko" <dko...@ru...>
> >To: <spr...@li...>
> >Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:49 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------