RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

[Rob H. <ro...@ca...>]

Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :)

Shootout at noon?

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Dmitriy Kopylenko
Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob)
3 against  (Juergen, Thomas, Colin)
1 neutral (Darren)


Colin Sampaleanu wrote:

> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to blame=20
> for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to branch/merge=20
> comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, I can see the=20
> revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am.
>
> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)...
>
>
> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>
>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dmitriy.
>>
>>
>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
>>
>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I personally =

>>> don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a democratic=20
>>> decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll concede ;-)
>>>
>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the creation=20
>>> date. That has been quite nice during our agile way towards 1.0. We=20
>>> could indeed reconsider to use version numbers there now.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all source=20
>>> files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is probably easy,=20
>>> @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment easy again.
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> Von: spr...@li... im=20
>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu
>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38
>>> An: spr...@li...
>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>>>
>>> =20
>>>
>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my classes =
or
>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't know=20
>>>>> if I've
>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    =20
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create new =
ones
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Dmitriy.
>>>>  =20
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when trying to
>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to =
exist
>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to going =
away
>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason.
>>>
>>> Colin
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D4721&alloc_id=3D10040&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D4721&alloc_id=3D10040&op=3Dclick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer