|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-07-28 21:36:22
|
Jérôme BERNARD wrote: > Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >> >>> >>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my classes or >>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't know if >>>> I've >>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>> >>>> >>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create new >>> ones ;-) >>> >>> Dmitriy. >> >> >> >> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when trying to >> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to >> exist when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to >> going away from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. > > > Simply use the "-kk" option. > Have a look at: http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs/doc/cvs_toc.html#TOC96 > Keywords are not an issue at all for branches & merges. > I think I'm missing something. If you just use -kk, then you don't get any actual values substituted, only the keyword itself gets left in there. Are you suggesting that for doing the merge, you check out both branches with -kk, and then merge using those copies? Sort of a pain, although it would work. Colin |