|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-07-27 19:34:21
|
> I think it was discussed before, but I just wanted to re-iterate. I just > want to be consistent with our javadoc style. I noticed there are some > @since tags with the date. Personally I would prefer the release version > as it's easier to see since what version the file (class) was > introduced, i.e @since 1.0.2. Good point. Maybe keep @since a date for things that predated 1.0? > > Also not all the files have @version tag with CVS $Id$ keyword > substitution. So I would propose the standard javadoc template for every > class, something like this: > > /** > * <Insert type description> > * > * @author <Developer Name> > * @since <Release version> > * @version $Id:$ > */ > > ...plus any optional tags such as @see +1. That looks like my code template (except I don't have @since). I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't know if I've worked on a particular file any more :-) Rgds Rod |