Re: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.1 RC1

[<jue...@we...>]

Sure - I still recommend to specify a brief "requestContextAttribute" =
name like "rc" for custom usage, though.
=20
The "springMacroRequestContext" should rather be considered an =
implementation detail of the Spring-provided macros, to be activated by =
the "exposeSpringMacroHelpers" flag.
=20
Juergen
=20

________________________________

Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
von Matt Raible
Gesendet: Sa 24.07.2004 20:46
An: spr...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.1 RC1




On Jul 24, 2004, at 7:12 AM, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
> Note that the "springMacroRequestContext" is not really meant to be
> accessed directly; it is mainly meant to be used by Spring-provided
> macros. If you want to use a RequestContext in your own expressions,
> always specify the "requestContextAttribute" accordingly. We should
> highlight that in the docs.
>

Right, but it actually does work if you use it.  To me, setting the
requestContextAttribute value seems to simply provide an alias for it.=20
Is it doing more than that?

>> I would make sure and document that the name
>> "springMacroRequestContext"
>> can be overridden by specifying a "requestContextAttribute" property.
>> It's much easier to write $rc.getMessage() than
>> $springMacroRequestContext.getMessage(). ;-)
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id=10040&op=3Dick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer