Re: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.1 RC1

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

Alef

Thanks for that. It's hard work, but it is important.

I would like to see us back up around 80%, but of course the integration
tests make things hard.

Clover reports are already produced by Luke's Maven script on monkeymachi=
ne,
so I just use those.

A couple of techniques we could consider to raise coverage:
- there are now mock libraries that use CGLIB to mock classes, not just
interfaces. Should make it easier to work with some of those nasty APIs
- I did consider trying to use AspectJ at one point, although that would
complicate the build

I vote that we try an additional mocking strategy and see where that make=
s
things easier.

Rgds
Rod

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alef Arendsen" <al...@jt...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 1:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.1 RC1


Our test coverage is about 70% right now (we used to be close to 80% just
before the 1.0 release) and although some classes are pretty hard to test
(probably only using integration tests) there is still room for improveme=
nt
IMHO. I just spent an hour on a couple of tests and increased coverage wi=
th
about 0.9%. It's tedious, I know, but definitely worth it.

I'll try to address some more areas where coverage is low, but if anybody
has some spare time, it would be great if you could have a look as well...

I'll also try to get coverage reports up-and-running with the integration
tests included if I have time.

Alef

________________________________

From: spr...@li... on behalf of
j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 11:45 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.1 RC1



Everybody,

Seems like we're finally ready for 1.1 RC1, already with full 1.1 scope:

- Mark has provided a refined version of the JMS support
- Thomas has already added support for JDBC-generated keys
- Darren has committed bind support for Velocity and FreeMarker
- Seth has contributed some tag refinements for JSP views.

The remaining tasks that I see are:

- We need to adapt the source code formatting of the JMS support: I still
see nasty empty lines after each code line on Windows: maybe Unix/Windows
line feed differences?


- I'd like to review the source code of the final version of JMS support.
Just about polishing and javadoc, as always before a release :-)


- Thomas is already working on using a single API approach for
JDBC-generated keys, including moving the classes to a different package.


- I'd like to move BindStatus and the new BindStatusHelper class from
servlet.tags to servlet.support. JSPs using the BindTag should still work=
,
provided that they get freshly compiled. Any objections to this?


- I'd like to refine resource loading in VelocityFormView and
FreeMarkerFormView: This is not entirely clean when combined with custom
resource paths yet, from a superficial glance.


- We need to add Seth's NestedPathTag and include his BindTag refinements.
I'll do this myself during the course of the week.


All things considered, this means a release by the end of the week: Any
earlier date would require dropping one of those tasks, which I don't thi=
nk
would be worth it. Thoughts?


Finally, regarding form simplification macros, i.e. Struts-style HTML inp=
ut
tag wrappers: Do we already have something here, for either JSP 2.0,
Velocity or FreeMarker?


Juergen



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id=10040&op=3Dick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer