RE: [Springframework-developer] aspectwerkz?

[jack h. <hij...@ho...>]

yeah, I like aspectWerkz. I think it's on right direct.
I don't like Spring AOP, I think it's not transparent enough to client code 
and it seems always interface/impl combo.

I think Spring should support aspectwerkz, especially the online weave 
model


>From: Barry Kaplan <gr...@me...>
>Reply-To: spr...@li...
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: [Springframework-developer] aspectwerkz?
>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:05:45 -0500
>
>I was just browsing thru the docs for the new aspectj support. Looks 
>interesting.
>
>Has anybody considered aspectwerkz? Since aspectwerkz already has a 
>spring-container integration, works with simple pojos, does not 
>require a compiler, is configured with attributes and xml, it seems 
>a much cleaner (or at least easier) fit with spring.
>
>(ref: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/AWARE/SpringAspectContainer)
>
>-bk
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
>FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
>Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer

_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger:  http://messenger.msn.com/cn