|
From: <jas...@ma...> - 2004-07-09 15:22:51
|
On 9 Jul 2004, at 16:08, tho...@tr... wrote: > Quoting "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>: > >>>> Regarding the name: EJB JARs don't have a special name, >> >>> They're called EARs. >> >> If I'm not totally confused, an EAR contains multiple WARs and EJB=20 >> JARs, with >> each EJB JAR in turn defining multiple EJBs. I was referring to the=20= >> latter, >> not to the big elephant deployment unit ;-) >> > > So that's what the E stands for. Then we should name it CAR - Chicken=20= > ARchive > :-) > > Or, How about BAR for Bean ARchive, PAR for POJO ARchive or LAR for=20 > Lightwheight > ARchive. Possibilities are endless. :) I've a fondness for the bar :) > Speaking of archives - is it necessary to deploy in an archive format=20= > or does > Geronimo support exploded directories? It will support exploded directories too (haven't checked if it does=20 already yet :). Whether its a file or a directory doesn't matter that=20 much in the grand scheme of things; its the layout that we need to=20 standardise on. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ |