|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2004-07-07 15:23:18
|
Also +1 Guillaume Poirier wrote: > +1 > > Rod Johnson wrote: > >> 2. Keep them until we get a better web based solution >> >> >> I'm not in favour of getting rid of the forums altogether, although I >> agree >> that the present SF forums are slow, lacking in features and poorly >> presented. >> >> I'm a bit concerned that the lists get a lot of traffic already; that >> subscribing to a list is more invasive (in my mind) than signing up to a >> forum; and that when evaluating a product I often browse forums to >> judge the >> responsiveness of a product's developers and users, while I don't >> tend to >> browse mailing lists, viewing them as more for committed users. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. >> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital >> self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched >> networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital > self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched > networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |