Re: [Springframework-developer] Proposal for Handler/Interceptor Enhancement

[Tim C. <tc...@ta...>]

But you can achieve the same thing in my solution without the 
duplication of URLs.

Seth Ladd wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> | In the example of a complex application that might have many
> | URLs/Interceptor combinations you are not really going to make things
> | any less complicated as you will end up having a huge amout of these. I
> | wonder if an alternative approach would be to be able to attach
> | interceptors directly to controllers:
>
> I'm OK with the complication *as an option* because I'm trying to
> divorce the mapping of the interceptors for the mapping of the URLs to
> Controllers.
>
> For simple situations, it should be easy to bind a interceptor to a
> HandlerMapping directly.
>
> Seth
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFA3H7GKZsFSwtW+wIRAuMnAJ4zUHVyIYFqRZJJLhCL8RrmxFaymACeI4Qh
> g/fHIX81ucIZvAx9SRQ4tHw=
> =wztk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital 
> self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched 
> networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>