Re: [Springframework-developer] Should DataBinder be an interface?

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

W/regards to issues with EasyMock, you may also want to try jMock 
(jmock.codehaus.org). It's quite nice, and now at a 1.0 version. I find 
it nicer than EasyMock in some respects...


Seth Ladd wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> In writing unit tests for my Controllers, I find I need to test the
> initBinder method and test what I place inside the binder (via
> registerCustomEditor).
>
> I tried mocking the DataBinder class w/ easymock + cglib extension, but
> it would generate an NPE.  The easymock list thinks this is a bug in
> their code, though haven't heard from them since.
>
> Is there a reason not to move (at some point) DataBinder to an
> interface?  This would help with testing and mocks.  Another option
> would be to create a MockDataBinder and add it to the spring-mocks.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
> Seth
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFAvm7fKZsFSwtW+wIRAuH+AJ0SvEc4sh6P8qaRe2XwEKoDVrspPwCfSWz7
> tOxXVGKAnmqsVuKrUoYVQHo=
> =2nLo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
> installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
> evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer