Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.2

[<se...@eh...>]

Quoting "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>:

> Repeated complaints that there were no default editors for =
> java.lang.Boolean, java.lang.Integer etc prompted that change. What we =
> register by default now are standard instances of CustomBooleanEditor =
> and CustomNumberEditor; in the latter case, using =
> Integer.parseInt/toString and co rather than a NumberFormat instance.
> =20
> Of course, those defaults can still be overridden by the usual =
> registerCustomEditor calls, typically with custom instances of =
> CustomBooleanEditor and CustomNumberEditor. What makes those editors =
> "custom" is that they're configurable, in contrast to most other =
> PropertyEditors. We just provide default instances of them now, but =
> still allow for registering customized instances.

OK, thanks for the update!  That will certainly cut down on some code.  Though I
like having the option of registering my own instances.  Another reason I like
Spring: great defaults, but easy to customize.

Seth


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.