Re: [Springframework-developer] MethodInvocationFactory

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

+1 for removing it. I don't think it will be needed. I did think at one
point that there might be value in pooling method invocations, but I don'=
t
think there is.

Rgds
Rod

----- Original Message -----
From: "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:52 AM
Subject: [Springframework-developer] MethodInvocationFactory


Rod,

I've noticed that the MethodInvocationFactory interface is effectively
unused: AdvisedSupport has a setter and a getter for it, but doesn't use =
a
passed-in MethodInvocationFactory for anything; there's no default either.
Is this supposed to allow for future enhancements? If it's completely unu=
sed
at the current point of time, we should probably still remove it for the
time being...

Juergen


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id=8166&op=3Dick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer