Re: [Springframework-developer] Emma code coverage tool

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

Colin

The Clover guys have been _very_ helpful to us and I think it's a good
product. I don't think we should switch to another product just because it's
open source and Clover is commercial. We're using it with their blessing for
the entire dev team.

Instrumenting code on the fly does sound interesting.

Rgds
Rod

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Sampaleanu" <col...@ex...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:52 AM
Subject: [Springframework-developer] Emma code coverage tool


> I think we're all pretty busy now, so now's not a great time, but we
> should maybe examine at some point the idea of switching to Emma
>   http://emma.sourceforge.net/
> for test code coverage analysis. It looks pretty decent; not quite on
> the level of Clover, but no license restrictions, and it actually does
> some things that Clover doesn't (as far as I can tell) like being able
> to instrument code on the fly (along with the normal
> pre-instrumentation) to do analysis without a pre-instrument phase.
>
> I'll probably be using this on any future coding I do...
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer