|
From: Seth L. <se...@eh...> - 2004-05-24 18:01:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: | Matt, | | We still haven't decided on how to proceed with the Commons Validator stuff; for the time being, it remains in the sandbox. If you like, please create an issue in our JIRA for it! | | As far as I see, it's just 8 classes, including a specific JSP custom tag; so I could imagine that we include it as part of the Spring distribution. I'm not sure if it should be part of Keith's emerging "spring-rules" subproject; that's rather gonna be a separate rules-based validation engine with its own plug into Spring's validation. And 8 integration classes aren't a convincing candidate for an own subproject either. | | You have used those Commons Validator integration classes pretty intensely, haven't you? Do you already consider them comprehensive enough for a release? Do you see any room for improvement there? Do you know of any existing alternative validation libraries that people could also want to have plugged into Spring? (To me, Commons Validator seems to be the only candidate for direct support in Spring at this point of time.) Just adding in my experience: I've been using the commons-validator code for a few weeks now and it's working great. It was really nice to simply move all my struts formbeans over to spring with hardly a change. Seth -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAsjjmKZsFSwtW+wIRAismAJ9RZfdMppkBInsrF3YlLm2OsYqfNQCfU7Yv xOJ3KjQIaksHKFy5whMUno0= =TQaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |