|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-05-18 08:00:25
|
+1 - I'll give them a brief review once they are in CVS. =20 I assume you've introduce an AbstractTemplateView class for these = properties? =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Di 18.05.2004 02:04 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Request and Session attributes = in template based views -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 16 May 2004 15:44, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Darren, > > While I do agree with the argument that a Controller should be solely > responsible for the exposed model, I see that there are valid = exceptions > to this rule. I wouldn't mind "exposeRequestAttributes", > "exposeSessionAttributes" and possibly also > "exposeServletContextAttributes" properties on an AbstractTemplateView > base class, as long as they are turned off by default. As those flags = are > trivial to add, we could already do this for 1.0.2. What do others = think? > > Juergen I've got code ready to commit if no-one objects to this addition. - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAqVMXKLMLAN01aw0RAkoGAJ9ZfAIULpBNY+qKZp4zLHnHgJjjuACfXMkY aNf3CzcwZ+iazVCgdz9khUU=3D =3D3CJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62&alloc_ida84&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |