|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2004-05-18 00:04:45
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 16 May 2004 15:44, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Darren, > > While I do agree with the argument that a Controller should be solely > responsible for the exposed model, I see that there are valid exceptions > to this rule. I wouldn't mind "exposeRequestAttributes", > "exposeSessionAttributes" and possibly also > "exposeServletContextAttributes" properties on an AbstractTemplateView > base class, as long as they are turned off by default. As those flags are > trivial to add, we could already do this for 1.0.2. What do others think? > > Juergen I've got code ready to commit if no-one objects to this addition. =2D --=20 Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAqVMXKLMLAN01aw0RAkoGAJ9ZfAIULpBNY+qKZp4zLHnHgJjjuACfXMkY aNf3CzcwZ+iazVCgdz9khUU=3D =3D3CJo =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |