Re: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs

[Hans D. <co...@po...>]

Only thing to consider is how to maintain the moved documentation.

Hans

> +1
>
> Also a wiki is often more informal... some stuff in the wiki is cool right
> where it is and never needs to be moved elsewhere.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Donald" <kd...@cs...>
> To: <spr...@li...>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:33 PM
> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs
>
>
> I agree with that.  I've always intended on using it to write
> documentation
> on new, still-to-be-released features which shouldn't be part of the main
> reference manual yet.  The agile format of a wiki allows for those docs to
> get posted, reviewed, edited quickly (perfect forum I think for flushing
> out
> the docs...) then after they're more mature and the features they cover
> are
> released and supported, move it to the more formal docbook/pdf format.
>
>>I don't think that keeping the documentation in two places (docbook and
> wiki)
> are a good idea... The wiki should be considered as a scrapbook where
> documentation is developed and when mature enough moved to the official
> reference document.
>
>
>
>
>