Re: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

+1

Also a wiki is often more informal... some stuff in the wiki is cool right
where it is and never needs to be moved elsewhere.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Donald" <kd...@cs...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs


I agree with that.  I've always intended on using it to write documentation
on new, still-to-be-released features which shouldn't be part of the main
reference manual yet.  The agile format of a wiki allows for those docs to
get posted, reviewed, edited quickly (perfect forum I think for flushing out
the docs...) then after they're more mature and the features they cover are
released and supported, move it to the more formal docbook/pdf format.

>I don't think that keeping the documentation in two places (docbook and
wiki)
are a good idea... The wiki should be considered as a scrapbook where
documentation is developed and when mature enough moved to the official
reference document.