RE: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs

[Keith D. <kd...@cs...>]

I agree with that.  I've always intended on using it to write =
documentation
on new, still-to-be-released features which shouldn't be part of the =
main
reference manual yet.  The agile format of a wiki allows for those docs =
to
get posted, reviewed, edited quickly (perfect forum I think for flushing =
out
the docs...) then after they're more mature and the features they cover =
are
released and supported, move it to the more formal docbook/pdf format.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Eduardo Issao Ito
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:27 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Confluence & Docs


Alef Arendsen wrote:
> Then something else. What's the plan with the reference documentation? =

> I'd like to keep something like a PDF in place, since a lot of people=20
> like to have something offline. When we've got everything in=20
> confluence, I don't think moving it to dockbook again makes sense;=20
> that is, if a reasonable export to PDF is possible that resembles a=20
> bit...

I don't think that keeping the documentation in two places (docbook and
wiki)=20
are a good idea... The wiki should be considered as a scrapbook where=20
documentation is developed and when mature enough moved to the official=20
reference document.

Comments?


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of =
GenToo
technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dcli=
ck
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer