|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-04-04 13:50:46
|
Let's get this on a wiki page. Confluence, please :-) I think we should also commit on the roadmap to: - More bean definition options, scripting and a good JDBC option. Some of this might make 1.1; some 1.2. We should not hold 1.1 for it, but just se= e what's ready in time. - Dynamic reconfiguration. I'm working on this and should have something = in the sandbox in the next couple of weeks. Assuming enough people are interested in this to start kicking the tyres and helping with testing, I= 'm optimistic we'll get it in for 1.1. I think it's an important feature. - JSF integration: at least the easy part of it, for 1.1. Ed Burns, the s= pec lead, is very interested in Spring and has offered to help us with this, which is fantastic. I see 1.1 as an evolutionary release, without notable new concepts. I'm also keen to work in the longer term towards anything that can furthe= r simplify development: for example, leveraging metadata attributes to more things. (Anyone tried the metadata-driven web controller option, btw?) If you have any suggestions for making developers' lives easier, please shar= e them, so we can make Spring even better. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: <tho...@tr...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > > From a JDBC perspective I'd like to add support for JDBC 3.0 auto generated > keys, maybe via an SqlInsert object. This should be possible for 1.1. > > I'd also like to see support for declaring ApplicationContexts using a scripting > language like Jython. This would probably be best for 1.2. > > James Duncan Davidson has an interesting take on Ant and XML files: > http://x180.net/Articles/Java/AntAndXML.html > > Thomas > > > Quoting Colin Sampaleanu <col...@ex...>: > > > I'll be writing a number of tools to support some people here in code > > manipulation and debuggin, but I'm not sure exactly how much actual U= I > > there'll be. A fair number of them may be command-line or with simple > > UIs, so at this point it's not a given that I'll need any sort of > > complicated library. I'll probably be starting in about 3-4 weeks. > > > > As for Eclipse, I've used it for ages, but on the programming side I'= m > > actually a complete neophyte, although I'm itching to get into the RC= P stuff > > > > Keith Donald wrote: > > > > >Colin, > > > > > >When do you think you'll be moving to the client-side? It'd be grea= t to > > >work together. I have a similiar requirement: I need RCP in my curr= ent > > >project, so I will be nicely aligned for developing the module over = the > > >coming months. It would be great if you could be an early adopter a= nd > > >developer at the same time... > > > > > >If you decide to go Eclipse RCP that would be good, too. The main upside I > > >think we can offer is better Swing support (Swing is more mature tha= n SWT, > > >and obviously a standard) and a nice integration with the rest of Spring. > > >But having an Eclipse expert would be invaluable for improving our platform > > >capabilities. I'd also be interested in seeing if there are ways we can > > >integrate with the Eclipse effort as it matures, too. > > > > > >Keith > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Colin Sampaleanu" <col...@ex...> > > >To: <spr...@li...> > > >Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:20 PM > > >Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Actually it's looking like I may be doing some client-side work (as > > >>opposed to the mostly back-end/web stuff I am doing now), so I may = get > > >>involved. Haven't decided if I want to do the stuff in Swing or Eclipse > > >>RCP though... > > >> > > >> > > >>Keith Donald wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Just like to add to the pot here regarding spring-rcp (especially since > > >>> > > >>> > > >work > > > > > > > > >>>is picking back up now): > > >>> > > >>>- I'd like to target the first 1.0 RCP release candidate along sid= e > > >>> > > >>> > > >Spring > > > > > > > > >>>1.1 final this summer. > > >>> > > >>>We plan to include in the distribution a sample application demonstrating > > >>>the features of the platform (likely a port of the PetClinic or Thomas's > > >>>Beer app, adding RCP value like 'quick' sorting/filtering and as-you-type > > >>>field validation.) I am hopeful by the first release we'll have several > > >>>articles lined up, too (I know several people interested in rich client > > >>> > > >>> > > >dev > > > > > > > > >>>have expressed interest in helping out there!) > > >>> > > >>>Thanks, > > >>>Keith > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: spr...@li... > > >>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf > > >>> > > >>> > > >Of > > > > > > > > >>>j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] > > >>>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:44 AM > > >>>To: spr...@li... > > >>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Good point regarding scheduling 1.1.1. I've intended to fill in a > > >>>placeholder to make the gap to 1.2 RC1 seem less large ;-) I completely > > >>>agree that we shouldn't schedule such point releases in an officia= l > > >>> > > >>> > > >release > > > > > > > > >>>plan. > > >>> > > >>>If we manage to get JSF and/or Portlet support done in time for 1.= 1, then > > >>>I'm all for including it earlier. I'd like to release 1.1 final by the > > >>> > > >>> > > >end > > > > > > > > >>>of August, though; I don't want to delay it for further features. > > >>> > > >>>Juergen > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: spr...@li... > > >>>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf > > >>> > > >>> > > >Of > > > > > > > > >>>Rod Johnson > > >>>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2:41 PM > > >>>To: spr...@li... > > >>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Some comments: > > >>> > > >>>Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements > > >>>- 1.0.1: early April > > >>>- 1.0.2: late May > > >>> > > >>>Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation > > >>>[RJ: pointcut expression language (AOP), JSR-175 preview? ] > > >>>- 1.1 RC1: early July > > >>>- 1.1 final: late August > > >>>- 1.1.1: late September > > >>>[RJ: why are we _scheduling_ a 1.1.1?] > > >>> > > >>>Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support > > >>>- 1.2 RC1: early November > > >>>- 1.2 final: late December > > >>> > > >>>Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quit= e a bit > > >>> > > >>> > > >of > > > > > > > > >>>interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also important > > >>>for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on providing official > > >>>support before 1.2, though. > > >>> > > >>>[RJ: depends on what's involved. I'd be keen to have JSF support sooner > > >>>rather than later if it's straightforward. I'm going to be looking= at > > >>> > > >>> > > >that > > > > > > > > >>>soon. Portlets I think are more of a niche interest. ] > > >>> > > >>>Regards, > > >>>Juergen > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3D= click > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > Spr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope= r > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dc= lick > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |