RE: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.1

[Alef A. <al...@jt...>]

I tend to be in favor of waiting a little while. Tiny issues keep coming =
up
and I guess it's worth waiting for some more. As Rod says, stability is =
key,
no need to rush here...

In the meantime I think we should inform users of major issues (like the
Hibernate one) in a more prominent way however, along with some =
potential
workarounds...

Alef


> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...] On =
Behalf
> Of Colin Sampaleanu
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:43 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.1
>=20
> +0
>=20
> I agree for the most part with trying to catch other issues, however =
the
> Hibernate session bug is _very_ nasty for people that actually get hit
> by it. Now those people can pull out and run a CVS if they think to =
come
> here and ask, but still...
>=20
> Rod Johnson wrote:
>=20
> >I suggest that we sit on this code for at least a week until we =
release
> it,
> >so we can catch anything else. How about we target Monday week for
> release?
> >
> >A 1.0.1 release should be driven by stability, not date, so we should =
see
> if
> >any more issues come out of the woodwork.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>
> >To: <spr...@li...>
> >Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:57 AM
> >Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.1
> >
> >
> >Hi everybody,
> >
> >From my point of view, the code is ready for release 1.0.1. There =
were a
> >couple of bug fixes and minor enhancements since 1.0 final. The most
> >important fix is proper Hibernate/JTA resource management when flush
> fails.
> >Enhancements include the introduction of the MessageCodesResolver
> interface
> >in the validation package, and a more efficient internal =
implementation
> of
> >AbstractMessageSource. See the changelog for details.
> >
> >Please give the current CVS snapshot a try. There shouldn't be any
> issues,
> >as changes are minor and just affect specific functionality. I'd like =
to
> >target mid next week for the release, i.e. two weeks after 1.0 final. =
In
> the
> >meantime, the only thing I plan to address is the lack of remoting
> coverage
> >in the reference docs. If anyone feels the need to improve other =
parts of
> >the docs, please do so till mid next week!
> >
> >Juergen
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dick
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer