|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-04-02 22:09:34
|
Absolutely agree. XML shouldn't be the only major config choice, especial= ly now we've nicely decoupled bean definition registries from readers. It looks like Groovy really has a lot of momentum now. Another configuration option I'll be looking at shortly is improved datab= ase storage. I'm going to need this for a client. I'm also looking at hot reload of contexts. I should have something in th= e sandbox in the next week or so. It looks quite exciting, and enables any bean definition to be modified: even to have different dependencies. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Donald" <kd...@cs...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:59 PM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Road map I think experimenting with integration with scripting languages like Groovy/Beanshell/Jython for configuration sounds like a great idea. I li= ke how lists, maps, and properties are "first class citizens." Groovy was just accepted as a JSR which I find interesting! Keith -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf = Of tho...@tr... Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:09 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map >From a JDBC perspective I'd like to add support for JDBC 3.0 auto >generated keys, maybe via an SqlInsert object. This should be possible for 1.1. I'd also like to see support for declaring ApplicationContexts using a scripting language like Jython. This would probably be best for 1.2. James Duncan Davidson has an interesting take on Ant and XML files: http://x180.net/Articles/Java/AntAndXML.html Thomas Quoting Colin Sampaleanu <col...@ex...>: > I'll be writing a number of tools to support some people here in code > manipulation and debuggin, but I'm not sure exactly how much actual UI > there'll be. A fair number of them may be command-line or with simple > UIs, so at this point it's not a given that I'll need any sort of > complicated library. I'll probably be starting in about 3-4 weeks. > > As for Eclipse, I've used it for ages, but on the programming side I'm > actually a complete neophyte, although I'm itching to get into the RCP stuff > > Keith Donald wrote: > > >Colin, > > > >When do you think you'll be moving to the client-side? It'd be great > >to work together. I have a similiar requirement: I need RCP in my > >current project, so I will be nicely aligned for developing the > >module over the coming months. It would be great if you could be an > >early adopter and developer at the same time... > > > >If you decide to go Eclipse RCP that would be good, too. The main > >upside I think we can offer is better Swing support (Swing is more > >mature than SWT, and obviously a standard) and a nice integration > >with the rest of Spring. But having an Eclipse expert would be > >invaluable for improving our platform capabilities. I'd also be > >interested in seeing if there are ways we can integrate with the > >Eclipse effort as it matures, too. > > > >Keith > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Colin Sampaleanu" <col...@ex...> > >To: <spr...@li...> > >Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:20 PM > >Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > > > > > > > > > >>Actually it's looking like I may be doing some client-side work (as > >>opposed to the mostly back-end/web stuff I am doing now), so I may > >>get involved. Haven't decided if I want to do the stuff in Swing or > >>Eclipse RCP though... > >> > >> > >>Keith Donald wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Just like to add to the pot here regarding spring-rcp (especially > >>>since > >>> > >>> > >work > > > > > >>>is picking back up now): > >>> > >>>- I'd like to target the first 1.0 RCP release candidate along side > >>> > >>> > >Spring > > > > > >>>1.1 final this summer. > >>> > >>>We plan to include in the distribution a sample application > >>>demonstrating the features of the platform (likely a port of the > >>>PetClinic or Thomas's Beer app, adding RCP value like 'quick' > >>>sorting/filtering and as-you-type field validation.) I am hopeful > >>>by the first release we'll have several articles lined up, too (I > >>>know several people interested in rich client > >>> > >>> > >dev > > > > > >>>have expressed interest in helping out there!) > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>>Keith > >>> > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: spr...@li... > >>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On > >>>Behalf > >>> > >>> > >Of > > > > > >>>j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:44 AM > >>>To: spr...@li... > >>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > >>> > >>> > >>>Good point regarding scheduling 1.1.1. I've intended to fill in a > >>>placeholder to make the gap to 1.2 RC1 seem less large ;-) I > >>>completely agree that we shouldn't schedule such point releases in > >>>an official > >>> > >>> > >release > > > > > >>>plan. > >>> > >>>If we manage to get JSF and/or Portlet support done in time for > >>>1.1, then I'm all for including it earlier. I'd like to release 1.1 > >>>final by the > >>> > >>> > >end > > > > > >>>of August, though; I don't want to delay it for further features. > >>> > >>>Juergen > >>> > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: spr...@li... > >>>[mailto:spr...@li...]On > >>>Behalf > >>> > >>> > >Of > > > > > >>>Rod Johnson > >>>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2:41 PM > >>>To: spr...@li... > >>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map > >>> > >>> > >>>Some comments: > >>> > >>>Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements > >>>- 1.0.1: early April > >>>- 1.0.2: late May > >>> > >>>Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation > >>>[RJ: pointcut expression language (AOP), JSR-175 preview? ] > >>>- 1.1 RC1: early July > >>>- 1.1 final: late August > >>>- 1.1.1: late September > >>>[RJ: why are we _scheduling_ a 1.1.1?] > >>> > >>>Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support > >>>- 1.2 RC1: early November > >>>- 1.2 final: late December > >>> > >>>Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quite > >>>a bit > >>> > >>> > >of > > > > > >>>interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also > >>>important for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on > >>>providing official support before 1.2, though. > >>> > >>>[RJ: depends on what's involved. I'd be keen to have JSF support > >>>sooner rather than later if it's straightforward. I'm going to be > >>>looking at > >>> > >>> > >that > > > > > >>>soon. Portlets I think are more of a niche interest. ] > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>>Juergen > >>> > >>> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dc= lick > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of Gen= Too technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dcli= ck _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |