Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.1

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

+0

I agree for the most part with trying to catch other issues, however the=20
Hibernate session bug is _very_ nasty for people that actually get hit=20
by it. Now those people can pull out and run a CVS if they think to come=20
here and ask, but still...

Rod Johnson wrote:

>I suggest that we sit on this code for at least a week until we release =
it,
>so we can catch anything else. How about we target Monday week for relea=
se?
>
>A 1.0.1 release should be driven by stability, not date, so we should se=
e if
>any more issues come out of the woodwork.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>
>To: <spr...@li...>
>Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:57 AM
>Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.0.1
>
>
>Hi everybody,
>
>From my point of view, the code is ready for release 1.0.1. There were a
>couple of bug fixes and minor enhancements since 1.0 final. The most
>important fix is proper Hibernate/JTA resource management when flush fai=
ls.
>Enhancements include the introduction of the MessageCodesResolver interf=
ace
>in the validation package, and a more efficient internal implementation =
of
>AbstractMessageSource. See the changelog for details.
>
>Please give the current CVS snapshot a try. There shouldn't be any issue=
s,
>as changes are minor and just affect specific functionality. I'd like to
>target mid next week for the release, i.e. two weeks after 1.0 final. In=
 the
>meantime, the only thing I plan to address is the lack of remoting cover=
age
>in the reference docs. If anyone feels the need to improve other parts o=
f
>the docs, please do so till mid next week!
>
>Juergen
> =20
>