Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Actually it's looking like I may be doing some client-side work (as=20
opposed to the mostly back-end/web stuff I am doing now), so I may get=20
involved. Haven't decided if I want to do the stuff in Swing or Eclipse=20
RCP though...


Keith Donald wrote:

>Just like to add to the pot here regarding spring-rcp (especially since =
work
>is picking back up now):
>
>- I'd like to target the first 1.0 RCP release candidate along side Spri=
ng
>1.1 final this summer.
>
>We plan to include in the distribution a sample application demonstratin=
g
>the features of the platform (likely a port of the PetClinic or Thomas's
>Beer app, adding RCP value like 'quick' sorting/filtering and as-you-typ=
e
>field validation.)  I am hopeful by the first release we'll have several
>articles lined up, too (I know several people interested in rich client =
dev
>have expressed interest in helping out there!)
>
>Thanks,
>Keith
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf=
 Of
>j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:44 AM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map
>
>
>Good point regarding scheduling 1.1.1. I've intended to fill in a
>placeholder to make the gap to 1.2 RC1 seem less large ;-) I completely
>agree that we shouldn't schedule such point releases in an official rele=
ase
>plan.
>
>If we manage to get JSF and/or Portlet support done in time for 1.1, the=
n
>I'm all for including it earlier. I'd like to release 1.1 final by the e=
nd
>of August, though; I don't want to delay it for further features.
>
>Juergen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf =
Of
>Rod Johnson
>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2:41 PM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map
>
>
>Some comments:
>
>Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements
>- 1.0.1: early April
>- 1.0.2: late May
>
>Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation
>[RJ: pointcut expression language (AOP), JSR-175 preview? ]
>- 1.1 RC1: early July
>- 1.1 final: late August
>- 1.1.1: late September
>[RJ: why are we _scheduling_ a 1.1.1?]
>
>Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support
>- 1.2 RC1: early November
>- 1.2 final: late December
>
>Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quite a bi=
t of
>interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also importan=
t
>for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on providing official
>support before 1.2, though.
>
>[RJ: depends on what's involved. I'd be keen to have JSF support sooner
>rather than later if it's straightforward. I'm going to be looking at th=
at
>soon. Portlets I think are more of a niche interest. ]
>
>Regards,
>Juergen
> =20
>