RE: [Springframework-developer] Road map

[Keith D. <kd...@cs...>]

Just like to add to the pot here regarding spring-rcp (especially since =
work
is picking back up now):

- I'd like to target the first 1.0 RCP release candidate along side =
Spring
1.1 final this summer.

We plan to include in the distribution a sample application =
demonstrating
the features of the platform (likely a port of the PetClinic or Thomas's
Beer app, adding RCP value like 'quick' sorting/filtering and =
as-you-type
field validation.)  I am hopeful by the first release we'll have several
articles lined up, too (I know several people interested in rich client =
dev
have expressed interest in helping out there!)

Thanks,
Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:44 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map


Good point regarding scheduling 1.1.1. I've intended to fill in a
placeholder to make the gap to 1.2 RC1 seem less large ;-) I completely
agree that we shouldn't schedule such point releases in an official =
release
plan.

If we manage to get JSF and/or Portlet support done in time for 1.1, =
then
I'm all for including it earlier. I'd like to release 1.1 final by the =
end
of August, though; I don't want to delay it for further features.

Juergen


-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf =
Of
Rod Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2:41 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map


Some comments:

Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements
- 1.0.1: early April
- 1.0.2: late May

Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation
[RJ: pointcut expression language (AOP), JSR-175 preview? ]
- 1.1 RC1: early July
- 1.1 final: late August
- 1.1.1: late September
[RJ: why are we _scheduling_ a 1.1.1?]

Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support
- 1.2 RC1: early November
- 1.2 final: late December

Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quite a =
bit of
interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also =
important
for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on providing official
support before 1.2, though.

[RJ: depends on what's involved. I'd be keen to have JSF support sooner
rather than later if it's straightforward. I'm going to be looking at =
that
soon. Portlets I think are more of a niche interest. ]

Regards,
Juergen



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of =
GenToo
technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dick
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of =
GenToo
technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dcli=
ck
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of =
GenToo
technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=CCk
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer